News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:MITM on HTTPS traffic in Kazakhstan by AWildC182 on Thursday July 18, 2019 @02:21PM (#20472565)
Corporations also do this so they can scan traffic for data exfil.
Re:MITM on HTTPS traffic in Kazakhstan by yusyusyus on Thursday July 18, 2019 @02:47PM (#20472834)
Which is, tbqh, a useless solution. Oh wow, now an attacker just has to include some obfuscated javascript encryption lib. Bam. Exfil detection completely bypassed.
Re:MITM on HTTPS traffic in Kazakhstan by bsder on Friday July 19, 2019 @12:32AM (#20476193)
True, but Joe Dipseedoodle doesn't accidentally send out an HR report because he was logged into his personal email account.

Too much security is willing to give up on the 95% because they can't get the 100%.

Re:MITM on HTTPS traffic in Kazakhstan by vbezhenar on Thursday July 18, 2019 @03:20PM (#20473076)
For example corporations might want to make sure that worker is not sending e-mails with confidential data from its gmail. Sophisticated thief surely will circumvent that kind of protection, but a lot of thieves are stupid, so simple measures actually work.
Re:MITM on HTTPS traffic in Kazakhstan by smallbigfish on Thursday July 18, 2019 @02:32PM (#20472691)
Is that a new word I should know?
Re:MITM on HTTPS traffic in Kazakhstan by jcranmer on Thursday July 18, 2019 @02:34PM (#20472704)
It's a shortened version of "exfiltration"