Re:Notre-Dame came closer to collapsing than people knew
by userbinator on Wednesday July 17, 2019 @07:30AM
(#20458301)
Too many false alarms?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Notre-Dame came closer to collapsing than people knew
by londons_explore on Wednesday July 17, 2019 @07:47AM
(#20458396)
One sensor detecting a fire can be a false alarm. More than one sensor detecting a fire is very rarely a false alarm, and really ought to call the fire department.
Re:Notre-Dame came closer to collapsing than people knew
by silvestrov on Wednesday July 17, 2019 @08:29AM
(#20458679)
Most automatic alarms are false. As far as I remember it's more than 90% in Denmark.
Accepting an error rate at 98% for Notre Dame should be a no-brainer.
Re:Notre-Dame came closer to collapsing than people knew
by Johnny555 on Wednesday July 17, 2019 @03:54PM
(#20463322)
There's a cost for deploying firetrucks, both in dollars and opportunity cost -- when you send 5 trucks to Notre Dame twice a week just in case the alarm is real this time, those trucks and firefighters aren't available to respond to a real fire
Re:Notre-Dame came closer to collapsing than people knew
by perfunctory on Wednesday July 17, 2019 @11:38AM
(#20460610)
I dunno. Do you want fire trucks sirening through the city blocking traffic every day?
Re:Notre-Dame came closer to collapsing than people knew
by 0xffff2 on Wednesday July 17, 2019 @01:51PM
(#20462180)
That's already a fact of life in every large city I've ever been in.
Re:Notre-Dame came closer to collapsing than people knew
by giancarlostoro on Wednesday July 17, 2019 @07:52AM
(#20458425)
Do we know this to be true? If the alarm is going off for a good solid few minutes it might be worth a checkup.