Re:Why did we wait so long for the bicycle?
by mikepurvis on Monday July 15, 2019 @04:13PM
(#20444729)
Yeah but the alternative in antiquity wasn't "whatever squishy compound", it was wood, perhaps with a metal strap around it, like a carriage wheel.
Which is why in the early wooden “bikes” (you were sitting on a wooden bar and pushing with your legs) they made the bar “squishy” by adding some sort of saddle or some adapted spring dampers or sth.
Re:Why did we wait so long for the bicycle?
by DoctorOetker on Tuesday July 16, 2019 @08:31AM
(#20449408)
It's interesting that wood is considered impractical for a bicycle... but somehow practical for a carriage?
Carriages used to have suspensions (made from some elastic whale bone I believe).
If someone would attempt to build a bicycle in a time of carriages with carriage wheels, I would then expect this person to also copy (at least in analogy) the suspension systems for carriages of that time, if not on the first try at least on the second...
Understood.
Re:Why did we wait so long for the bicycle?
by CydeWeys on Monday July 15, 2019 @05:26PM
(#20445433)
That's not really accurate. Docked bikeshare systems in US major cities use real pneumatic tires. Citibike in NYC, whatever Ford Bike in SF is called now, Capital Bikeshare in DC, and more.
It's just some of the cheap dockless purveyors that use non-pneumatic tires, and these companies have been dropping like flies. The docked bikeshares by contrast are still (slowly) expanding with their superior, but admittedly more expensive, bicycles.
Pretty much all modern rideshare bicycles do not have pneumatic tires, FWIW. Ride quality suffers, but it's not an awful tradeoff for short trips with whatever squishy compound they use now.