News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:To Break Google’s Monopoly on Search, Make Its Index Public by malvosenior on Monday July 15, 2019 @02:33PM (#20443714)
> Now, if you suspect that the instant search results are politically biased, then the burden of proof is on you to provide evidence of that existence

The proof is a senior Google employee admitting to bias and manipulating results in the Project Veritas video. There's also plenty of anecdotal evidence you can see for yourself as a user. In addition to that I know many people who work at Google and the vast majority of them have extreme political bias.

Re:To Break Google’s Monopoly on Search, Make Its Index Public by bduerst on Monday July 15, 2019 @02:43PM (#20443814)
This is precisely the hand-waving I was talking about. An employee rambling in a bar does not constitute evidence of search result manipulation, especially when the person recording it is known for stretching information, inciting people to commit voter fraud, and crossing the U.S. Mexico border dressed as deceased Osama Bin Laden to prove some point.

Likewise, the handful of people you know having political views, in an organization of 85,000 people, is not evidence that that organization's search results being biased.

If there is so much anecdotal evidence then it should be easy for you to prove, right? Or are you afraid of being disproven?

Re:To Break Google’s Monopoly on Search, Make Its Index Public by malvosenior on Monday July 15, 2019 @02:51PM (#20443895)
You asked for proof and I gave it to you. I'm sorry you don't like the source, but unless you want to address what Jen Gennai said, I don't think you have much of a point.
Re:To Break Google’s Monopoly on Search, Make Its Index Public by bduerst on Monday July 15, 2019 @03:35PM (#20444346)
Jen Gennai herself points out how Veritas is lying about what she said: https://medium.com/@gennai.jen/this-is-not-how-i-expected-mo...

James Okeefe is publicly known for selectively editing video to make false representations, and this duck is no different.

You specifically claimed that there's plenty of anecdotal evidence. Where is it?

Re:To Break Google’s Monopoly on Search, Make Its Index Public by knowaveragejoe on Monday July 15, 2019 @08:35PM (#20446568)
The "proof" is extremely shaky. Veritas has a record of creating these types of videos where they draw conclusions out of thin air. Here's what the person in particular has to say:

https://medium.com/@gennai.jen/this-is-not-how-i-expected-mo...

Re:To Break Google’s Monopoly on Search, Make Its Index Public by nova22033 on Monday July 15, 2019 @03:20PM (#20444181)
There's also plenty of anecdotal evidence you can see for yourself as a user. In addition to that I know

> anecdotal evidence > I know

So much hard data here...real hacker news material...

Re:To Break Google’s Monopoly on Search, Make Its Index Public by malvosenior on Monday July 15, 2019 @03:29PM (#20444278)
You conveniently leave off:

"The proof is a senior Google employee admitting to bias and manipulating results in the Project Veritas video."

Re:To Break Google’s Monopoly on Search, Make Its Index Public by bduerst on Monday July 15, 2019 @04:49PM (#20445124)
https://medium.com/@gennai.jen/this-is-not-how-i-expected-mo...

>Project Veritas has edited the video to make it seem that I am a powerful executive who was confirming that Google is working to alter the 2020 election. On both counts, this is absolute, unadulterated nonsense, of course. In a casual restaurant setting, I was explaining how Google’s Trust and Safety team (a team I used to work on) is working to help prevent the types of online foreign interference that happened in 2016. Google has been very public about the work that our teams have done since 2016 on this, so it’s hardly a revelation.