News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:No limit: AI poker bot is first to beat professionals at ... by ayemeng on Thursday July 11, 2019 @04:55PM (#20415744)
Curious, why was 100BB used for six max? If I recall right, the head ups experiment was 200BB?
Re:No limit: AI poker bot is first to beat professionals at ... by noambrown on Thursday July 11, 2019 @05:00PM (#20415796)
We considered both options but decided to go with 100BB because that is the standard in the poker world. It doesn't make a big difference for these techniques though.
Re:No limit: AI poker bot is first to beat professionals at ... by srkigo on Monday July 22, 2019 @03:40AM (#20495998)
Could you try to run a training with ante included in the pot? I wonder if open-limping would be a viable strategy with some hands. No one knows that and it would be really interesting to find out. Ante should be equal to BB, like it was in WSOP Main Event.
Re:No limit: AI poker bot is first to beat professionals at ... by ayemeng on Thursday July 11, 2019 @05:26PM (#20416014)
Does Pluribus care about opponent's stack depth? From the examples, it appears stacks were reset after each hand.
Re:No limit: AI poker bot is first to beat professionals at ... by bokonon12 on Thursday July 11, 2019 @04:58PM (#20415769)
Guessing it's because it's most similar to a regular 6max game. Also it should limit lower the number of possible ways to play a hand, less chips means the correct choices are easier, so maybe it's computationally easier
Re:No limit: AI poker bot is first to beat professionals at ... by ayemeng on Thursday July 11, 2019 @05:01PM (#20415807)
Yeah, my question for the author is if stack depth was relevant for this experiment. In headups, they exhausted the entire tree, in six max, they went to a fixed depth.