News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google admits listening to some smart speaker recordings by GrapeFriedNiggr on Thursday July 11, 2019 @03:05PM (#20414459)
Well yeah, but it would be way more expensive and you would have orders of magnitude less data. There are also issues with biased sampling.

Point being, the search wouldn't be as good.

Re:Google admits listening to some smart speaker recordings by dang on Thursday July 11, 2019 @11:02PM (#20417746)
Trollish usernames aren't allowed on HN because they end up trolling each thread you post to.

https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&dateRange=all&type=comme...

I've banned this account for now, but if you want to email [email protected] a new username, we can rename the account and unban it for you.

Re:Google admits listening to some smart speaker recordings by ryandrake on Thursday July 11, 2019 @03:23PM (#20414716)
This assumes a fixed definition of “good.” I would argue that the search would be better because it was done using data collected only from parties who have given consent.

You can define “good” in terms of cost, revenue, sampling bias, relevance, etc. I can define it in terms of ethical data collection and usage. Who’s to say which definition is correct?