Re:Malicious apps infect 25M Android devices with 'Agent Smi...
by bongobongo on Thursday July 11, 2019 @12:56PM
(#20413159)
Let's not be silly, there is no market in this case. It's an oligopoly and occasional cartel.
Re:Malicious apps infect 25M Android devices with 'Agent Smi...
by scarface74 on Thursday July 11, 2019 @05:14PM
(#20415911)
There is only so much competition you can have in wireless. Different carriers have to have different bands of spectrum and only certain frequencies can be used for cellular.
Re:Malicious apps infect 25M Android devices with 'Agent Smi...
by bongobongo on Thursday July 11, 2019 @08:11PM
(#20417050)
That's why it's not a market. Like I said.
The phone subsidies (in the US at least) are very reminiscent of the old leased phones of yore.
But if you look at the actions of mobile phone carriers and ISPs they're desperate not to become dumb pipes. They design all kinds of clever mechanisms and marketing strategies to distinguish themselves.
> Is there actually profit in providing more than that?
Well, in a free market, competition is intense. So if they can find ways to distort that, then yes: they will make more money. Many of us don't have much allegiance to particular gas station brands. But they create rewards programs to try and get some of that loyalty. Otherwise you just compete on price.