News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Our Postwar “Long Peace” Is Fragile (2018) by graeme on Thursday July 04, 2019 @12:04PM (#20355661)
It is a useful habit before making an assertion to google and see if there are statistics to be had.

War deaths are down globally, not just in Europe. The middle easy in a recent exception, as they had an uptick starting in the 2010s.

https://ourworldindata.org/war-and-peace

Re:Why Our Postwar “Long Peace” Is Fragile (2018) by DiogenesKynikos on Thursday July 04, 2019 @04:56PM (#20357728)
That "data" looks very suspect. For example, the graph titled "Violent deaths in conflicts and one-sided violence since 1989" appears to leave out the Iraq War. Maybe it relies on Iraq Body Count, which is known to undercount deaths by a factor of a few.

Even if one accepts this "data," however it's been put together, the 1970s and 1980s were extremely violent times. They may look tame in comparison to WWII, but we should remember that WWII is the bloodiest conflict in human history. The "long peace" really only refers to an era in which major powers did not fight one another directly, but rather through proxy conflicts in the Third World.

Re:Why Our Postwar “Long Peace” Is Fragile (2018) by rdiddly on Thursday July 04, 2019 @01:20PM (#20356221)
The middle easy in a recent exception? You lost me.
Re:Why Our Postwar “Long Peace” Is Fragile (2018) by tikhonj on Thursday July 04, 2019 @01:29PM (#20356276)
It's probably a typo: "The Middle East is...".
Re:Why Our Postwar “Long Peace” Is Fragile (2018) by graeme on Thursday July 04, 2019 @03:20PM (#20357023)
Indeed, that’s what I meant. The perils of turning off autocorrect.
Re:Why Our Postwar “Long Peace” Is Fragile (2018) by mavelikara on Thursday July 04, 2019 @01:34PM (#20356311)
I think GP meant Middle East.