News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The case against plant consciousness by Retric on Wednesday July 03, 2019 @09:03PM (#20350606)
The medical definition of conciseness includes things like responding to bright light by constructing the iris. It’s not high on the scale, but it’s very much part of the current definition in active usage. So, in practice it’s useful have level of consciousness and as such the minimum can be extremely low without becoming less meaningful.

More importantly as we understand more about the brain we may eventually understand how everything works. Any definition that would then exclude humans as conscious becomes irrelevant.

Re:The case against plant consciousness by bane on Wednesday July 03, 2019 @10:17PM (#20350946)
> The medical definition of conciseness includes things like responding to bright light by constructing the iris.

Which has an interesting parallel with many plant's ability to rotate the face of their leaves towards the current position of the sun.

Re:The case against plant consciousness by hndamien on Thursday July 04, 2019 @12:48AM (#20351626)
Mimosa Pudica and the Venus Fly Trap respond even faster (in iris response like times).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLTcVNyOhUc

Re:The case against plant consciousness by hathawsh on Wednesday July 03, 2019 @09:09PM (#20350643)
That's a very helpful clarification. Thanks!