Re:The case against plant consciousness
by blackhaz on Wednesday July 03, 2019 @05:18PM
(#20348901)
So we've got to panpsychism. Why not? We're in the company of Thales, Plato, Spinoza and Leibniz.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The case against plant consciousness
by ta1234567890 on Wednesday July 03, 2019 @05:51PM
(#20349237)
Thank you for teaching me something new, had never heard of panpsychism before - fascinating.
Do you know of this concept has been incorporated into physics somehow? Are there any models in physics that consider panpsychism as fundamental? (i.e. That consider consciousness as a basic property of matter/energy, just like the 3 special dimensions or time)
Re:The case against plant consciousness
by cnvqjpwips on Wednesday July 03, 2019 @08:53PM
(#20350552)