News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The case against plant consciousness. Parent comment

Re:The case against plant consciousness by daveFNbuck on Wednesday July 03, 2019 @04:12PM (#20348268)
> At the most abstract interpretation I think consciousness can be defined as a closed system that contain both input and output, in which information is gathered and alters some component of the system itself.

This is very similar to the definition I was given for "robot" in an embedded systems course.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The case against plant consciousness by justwalt on Wednesday July 03, 2019 @05:06PM (#20348775)
I think this is the point that the poster is trying to make. They’re saying it’s difficult to declare something conscious or not using exact criteria.

A popular definition (in my experience) is the existence of a central nervous system, but we don’t really know whether or not that’s responsible for consciousness. I wonder if we’ll ever know for sure.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The case against plant consciousness by matt-attack on Thursday July 04, 2019 @01:20AM (#20351786)
Well an unconscious body has a central nervous system but is clearly not conscious.
[ Parent | on HN ]