News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cloudflare Network Performance Issues by therein on Tuesday July 02, 2019 @02:33PM (#20338033)
> but he created the 201th repo (we had only paid for 200)

That's an odd choice of a failure mode.

> AWS still refunded all costs...

Yeah they should. It was their silly design choice that lead to disclosure of secrets after all.

What kind of failure mode is that even. Failing to create the repo would have led to a better user experience for sure.

Can you imagine if S3 charged more for private objects and once you reach your count, it just makes them public and posts them on Reddit?

Re:Cloudflare Network Performance Issues by samstave on Tuesday July 02, 2019 @03:16PM (#20338444)
>Can you imagine if S3 charged more for private objects and once you reach your count, it just makes them public and posts them on Reddit?

Exactly! What a stupid design UX.

Re:Cloudflare Network Performance Issues by joncrane on Wednesday July 03, 2019 @09:12AM (#20343981)
>It was their silly design choice that lead to disclosure of secrets after all.

Wait, was the 200 private repos issue an AWS thing or a GitHub/GitLab/whatever thing?

What AWS product has a concept of private/public repos and limits on how many of the former you can get for a certain price?

Re:Cloudflare Network Performance Issues by samstave on Wednesday July 03, 2019 @09:23AM (#20344044)
It was a git thing.

Never post aws secrets to git.