A good reason is because you rarely need exact measurements in cooking (vs. baking), and it's easy to eyeball approximate volumetric measurements, especially with help from the known volume of a container; also because many recipes need quantities of some ingredients (most frequently water) that would require a much larger and more expensive kitchen scale than most people would like to keep.
Weight, Distance - conversion is a lot easier in the metric system
You just mentioned that there were no differences, than why would you use units which have strange relations between each other instead of units that are easy to remember, easy to convert are based on math instead of historical/common knowledge?
Ok so when measuring water freezing, you have a nice 0. But how do you measure hot weather? 30C? 35C? Meaningless numbers, correct?
I am talking about daily weather. Celsius is no more intuitive than Fahrenheit when discussing it.
Even with cooking, when you are around a certain system, you're just used to it.
I bake a cake at 350F, I fry things at 350-400F. 175C is no more practical than 350F. I need to cook meat to at least 140F-160F to kill the bacteria.
The equivalents in Celsius are no easier to remember from a practical standpoint.
Even body temperature, from my understanding, almost everyone uses 98.5F, correct? (At least in India, where everything was KG and KM, people still used to measure body temperature in F).
When thinking about boiling water it is easier to think how close to it you are in Celsius, 50% if temp is 50 Celsius.
Personally I'm from Europe but live in US and have trouble with weather forecasts in Fahrenheit. They don't make sense especially when it gets cold.
Even IF Celsius and Fahrenheit were equally good for most purposes, it would be easier if every continent used the same system. Why, because people travel, often from continent to continent.
So if we (the people of Earth) should choose we should most probably choose Celsius, even if it were just slightly better than Fahrenheit.
There are things in the world other than fridges.
> When thinking about boiling water
I only really do this about 1% of the time I need to use temperature.
> Even IF Celsius and Fahrenheit were equally good for most purposes, it would be easier if every continent used the same system. Why, because people travel, often from continent to continent.
This is really the only reason to use Celsius: it works well with other things.
98.6 is the approximation most people memorize in Fahrenheit. That number implies more precision than you can reasonably assume in practice, however.
In Celsius, hot is 30 and cold is -10.
When talking about it for what you're wearing and subjective experience, Celsius is a little more awkward and compressed.
Sure, scientifically celsius is more useful, but how often does that overlap with the weather?
This comparison is utterly meaningless to me, and I say this as someone who prefers to use Celsius.
Generally speaking, you get freeze warnings and black ice warnings when necessary instead of checking to see whether or not the current temp is literally below the freezing point of water. I think OP was just saying that it's good enough for a layperson to use day-to-day.
0F is pretty dang cold out, and 100 is pretty dang hot out. Sure, there are temperatures in human habitats outside that range, but most people would consider then “extreme” temperatures, hence values less than zero, or greater than 100.
That is pretty subjective and no better than Celsius. Anything below 30F is pretty dang cold for me and anything above 85F is too hot
Or, you know, just keep the freezer cold enough to take care of it regardless.
I guess its cheaper to produce a one-sided measuring tape.
Theoretical physicists might be able to skip the units, but the rest of us farmers, engineers, cooks, are doing something practical when we measure.
I'm not really sure what you are arguing.
However, think of it this way: In conversational transfer of information, it makes zero difference. If I'm telling you something is 300 miles away, it isn't more useful for me to tell you it's 480 kilometers away. What extra information do you get from that? That it's 480,000 meters away? Humans can't properly visualize probably more than 100 meters. So what practical use when calculating driving distance is knowing that Kilometers vs meters the distance is?
Day-to-day using miles or inches for distance, gallons for volume, and now we have specialists using miles-per-gallon for fuel efficiency, cubic inches for stroke volume ...
"tsp", that's tablespoons, right? Teaspoons? Argh!
Temperature – absolutely no difference in _practicality_ in communicating about the daily weather in C or F. People that claim otherwise are usually just arguing for the system they grew up with.
Weight – no difference in measuring most larger weights in pounds vs kgs. (weighing people, furniture, cars, trucks, comparing the weight of laptops, etc)
Distance – Whether DC to NY is 220 miles or 352 kilometers makes no difference.
In most daily use, the differences in units probably don't make any difference to most people, which is why the cost of switching (so that it looks good on paper) just hasn't caught on.
However, in the sciences, in cooking, areas where you need precise measurements, grams, KG, etc all give you nicer units to work with.
When measuring things for DIY and home improvement, God, I wish I could do everything in meters and centimeters than 1/8 or 1/6 of an inch (mainly for doing calculations).
And when cooking, I cringe with "cups" and "tbsp" – I wish it were all grams and ml.