What is also quite fascinating to me is that many of the Cherokee of the time considered writing to be a form of witchcraft. Sequoyah allegedly [e.g., 1] decided that it was not based on his observations of white men, but his initial trials of teaching written Cherokee were sufficient to bring charges of witchcraft against his daughter, his first pupil. However, after some demonstrations, it was shown to be what it is, a very simple but extremely effective tool.

I'm sure many of the readers of this fine forum know the quote (and provenance, which I don't) that is something like 'any sufficiently advanced form of technology is indistinguishable from magic'.

[1]: https://cherokee.org/About-The-Nation/History/Facts/Sequoyah...

I’m curious what sorcery and witchcraft actually meant in the context of Cherokee society at the time.

The evidence we have from Egyptian, Mayan, Sumerian, and Chinese [1] shows that the evolution of writing tends to follow a similar pattern. You start with (simplified) pictorial representations of words. Extend this to words that are difficult to draw by use of homonyms or other phonological puns (the rebus principle). Eventually, you simplify the system by using a phonetic principle, largely based on syllables [2]. Sequoyah did follow these steps, but he used pre-existing knowledge of what written English looked like to arrive at the end in rather less time than ancient civilizations took.

An interesting note is that somewhere in the development of Egyptian writing, the vowels got dropped from the syllable representation, leaving an abjad which the Phoenicians borrowed... and then the Greeks added vowels to obtain the alphabet, while Sanskrit took a different path to get the abugida. As near as we can tell, this one turn away from a syllable-based phonetic system is unique in the history of independent development of writing systems.

[1] Indus Valley Script is undeciphered, and may not even be a full writing system, and so it is excluded here.

[2] This did not happen for the Chinese, but the Japanese borrowed the Chinese script and made two syllabaries out of it, hiragana and katakana, following the same basic principle.

The greeks adopted the phoenician alphabet, even though phonologically phoenician and greek languages have a lot of differences. I have read of a theory claiming that greeks simply misheard the sounds of the phoenicians and made the best adaptation for greek. So for example, alef [1] became a vowel in the greek alphabet, since the glottal consonant was not present in greek.

[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleph

> ancient Egyptian in that he tried to create a different symbol for each word

This is not how Egyptian hieroglyphs worked.

An common example

𓉐𓂋𓂻 - pr (v) - to leave

𓉐 is a house. It represents, here, the sound pr, which is the Egyptian word for house.

𓂋 is a mouth. It represents the r sound. Here, it's being used as a phonetic complement to emphasize that we're spelling a word here and not talking about a house.

𓂻 is a pair of legs. It's being used as a determinative to tell you the word has something to do with walking.