Re:Sperm-Donor Siblings: A Family Portrait
by Someone1234 on Friday June 28, 2019 @03:05PM
(#20307797)
Sorry is this is off-topic, but given the context, why are so many of them posed in seemingly erotic ways? It isn't just the women either look at Nik Morgan, 21 near the bottom (no pun intended).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
I think a lot of them aren’t really erotic, so much as there’s an overlap between “erotic poses” and “vulnerable poses.” A lot seemed to be posed in a manner that I would call, artificially, awkwardly, vulnerable.
Which might be the point, for all I know.
Re:Sperm-Donor Siblings: A Family Portrait
by earthscienceman on Friday June 28, 2019 @03:42PM
(#20308130)
It's definitely the point. Being the child of a sperm donor can be so uncomfortable. It seems like an extremely appropriate way to pose someone who is being confronted by such a deep part of themselves.
a cross between gucci advertisement, a mug shot, and old playboy articles.
it's indeed very strange to me, too.
I think they were playing with the ideas in the article being a bit alienating, so the photography tried to follow -- emphasis on tried.
If I had to label the photography: "sexy ennui' comes to mind.
Re:Sperm-Donor Siblings: A Family Portrait
by dexterdog on Friday June 28, 2019 @03:06PM
(#20307811)
Yeah, the photography choices are so odd. It made the presentation awkward and uncomfortable.
Yes, that's why it's genius.
[dead]