News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google’s new reCAPTCHA has a dark side by ajxs on Thursday June 27, 2019 @06:02PM (#20299292)
Is that so? What about the webmaster who simply wants to combat bots using his page, is the extent of data gathering on Google's behalf just part of the deal? What if selling user data is against the webmaster's ethics? "Don't use it I guess" Sure, except that no one in the exchange was told the extent to which this data is used, or what for. Users of Google's Captcha aren't told about this exchange. I disagree entirely that it's a matter of voluntarily opting in and out of Google's domain. Their business model depends on becoming inescapable, and they're not being honest about how their services collect our data.
Re:Google’s new reCAPTCHA has a dark side by tgragnato on Friday June 28, 2019 @08:55AM (#20303748)
> Their business model depends on becoming inescapable

What will happen with v3 if I block gstatic.com? Will I be given the highest threat score?

Re:Google’s new reCAPTCHA has a dark side by Izkata on Friday June 28, 2019 @01:54PM (#20307017)
Wait, now you have me wondering: If this is just javascript from another domain, what's preventing bots from proxying requests, intercepting this one, and replacing it with a dummy function that returns a "no threat" score?
Re:Google’s new reCAPTCHA has a dark side by tgragnato on Friday June 28, 2019 @05:51PM (#20309063)
Re:Google’s new reCAPTCHA has a dark side by Izkata on Friday June 28, 2019 @06:14PM (#20309206)
So... the answer is, nothing prevents it?
Re:Google’s new reCAPTCHA has a dark side by tgragnato on Friday June 28, 2019 @07:12PM (#20309586)
When the API reports a failed verification, the webmaster knows that the response has been tampered with?