I sorta understand the sentiment where there are tools like :
https://amiunique.org/ https://browserprint.info/
whose results would have you believe that one's footprint is very unique. I'd be interested in hearing more about why this is hard to implement into an efficient process.
Re:Google’s new reCAPTCHA has a dark side
by saagarjha on Thursday June 27, 2019 @05:44PM
(#20299145)
> GitHub is always at your disposal. NV doesn’t sell the consumer cards to enterprises. So on AWS a multi-GPU box will cost you about 12 dollars an hour.
I don’t see how this is related to the claim, since it doesn’t solve the problem. But the advertising company that I let run code on my website will certainly do the job pretty well, I’d say.
Re:Google’s new reCAPTCHA has a dark side
by benreesman on Thursday June 27, 2019 @08:32PM
(#20300367)
I was pointing out that it’s a commercially applicable of a very strongly worded claim that I know would be expensive to test because I’m optimizing GPU intensive code at the moment. I don’t know where in this thread I generated so much ill will for trying to add knowledge to the conversation, but I’m not making shit up.
Cheat sheet: you can’t.