Re:Cisco Leap Frogs H.264 Video Collaboration with Real-Time...
by stefan_ on Thursday June 27, 2019 @07:25AM
(#20293443)
Real-time is such an unfortunate term when talking about video collaboration. A codec that can achieve real-time encoding speed is still useless if it has a 10 frame latency to output the first data, and arguably not real-time.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Cisco Leap Frogs H.264 Video Collaboration with Real-Time...
by MisterTea on Thursday June 27, 2019 @11:54AM
(#20295550)
The proper term should is low-latency. Real-time implies deterministic timing of events which must meet a deadline.
Real-time can give you low latency but so can a system with a high enough throughput.
Re:Cisco Leap Frogs H.264 Video Collaboration with Real-Time...
by morerunes on Thursday June 27, 2019 @08:26AM
(#20293782)
~1/3 second is perfectly acceptable to me to be within the range of "real time", and is quick enough that I'd be willing to bet most people won't notice even in a two way conversation.
Re:Cisco Leap Frogs H.264 Video Collaboration with Real-Time...
by Benjamin_Dobell on Thursday June 27, 2019 @09:06AM
(#20294003)
For live streaming and chat that's fairly acceptable. However, don't forget there are other potential use cases, particularly since cloud gaming is supposedly becoming a thing again.