News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The West’s failed fight against China’s ‘Cloud Hopper’ ha... by Angostura on Wednesday June 26, 2019 @07:34AM (#20283931)
Some top-notch reporting from Reuters here, I think. Kudos to them for sinking this level of editorial resource into a story.
[dead]
Re:The West’s failed fight against China’s ‘Cloud Hopper’ ha... by dang on Wednesday June 26, 2019 @02:56PM (#20288023)
This breaks the site guidelines, which ask you to assume good faith. That's not because everyone is necessarily in good faith—though close observation shows that it is more likely to be true here than many users think. Rather, it's because not making that assumption leads to community-eroding behavior. Please don't post like this.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re:The West’s failed fight against China’s ‘Cloud Hopper’ ha... by iakh on Wednesday June 26, 2019 @10:01PM (#20291134)
Doesn't GP break the same rule then?
Re:The West’s failed fight against China’s ‘Cloud Hopper’ ha... by dang on Thursday June 27, 2019 @12:19AM (#20291724)
I don't see how.
Re:The West’s failed fight against China’s ‘Cloud Hopper’ ha... by chance_state on Wednesday June 26, 2019 @10:44AM (#20285463)
Do you believe that Reuters engages or would engage in a disinformation campaign at the behest of a western government? If so, do you have evidence to share with us that supports this belief?

Similarly, Reuters points to three anonymous sources in the article. Do you believe that Reuters fabricated these sources? If so, do you have evidence to share with us that supports this belief?

Re:The West’s failed fight against China’s ‘Cloud Hopper’ ha... by ghostpepper on Wednesday June 26, 2019 @10:40AM (#20285435)
If you don't trust Reuters then you might as well not read any news at all.
Re:The West’s failed fight against China’s ‘Cloud Hopper’ ha... by iserlohnmage on Wednesday June 26, 2019 @10:29AM (#20285332)
I second this.
Re:The West’s failed fight against China’s ‘Cloud Hopper’ ha... by raverbashing on Wednesday June 26, 2019 @10:27AM (#20285311)
Interesting how the "level of concern" raises in some news articles. Good that the general audience can usually see through it.