News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:San Francisco Becomes First U.S. City to Pass an E-Cigare... by objectivetruth on Tuesday June 25, 2019 @07:29PM (#20280331)
>JUUL was making kid-desired flavors like "candy corn" and "unicorn milk".

No, that's incorrect. Juul manufactured "Fruit Medley" and "Mango," both of which are now restricted to online-only sales through their age-verification platform. There are thousands of other vendors who sell sweet-flavored nicotine solutions, though.

I also fundamentally disagree that only children like sweet flavors, and I wonder why fruit-flavored ciders and liqueurs are still legal.

>E-cigs are essentially a very addictive substance (Nicotine) and a bunch of unregulated (and unreported) substances + flavor.

So are regular cigarettes. But regular cigarettes also include the inhalation of a significant amount of tar.

>They're also disguised as usb-keys and hard to detect (not like a cigarette).

It's not a disguise. When first released, Juul's form factor was fairly distinctive but there are a wide variety of commercial e-cigarette form factors now. I'm also not sure what "hard to detect" has to do with anything -- by who, when, in what context?

>I'm sure SF lobbied with JUUL before laying down the ban-hammer.

What does this mean? The phrasing is usually "Company X lobbied Politician Y" or "Company X hired a lobbyist to lobby members of Legislature Z."

There are no comments on this comment yet.