It is a big selling point. So is being accessible via any standards-compliant MUA, as opposed to e.g. Proton Mail and Tutanota. I'd love for there to be a secure email service with my privacy protected both by law and cryptography which also has me in full control of my data; until then it's a hard choice but I'd prefer to stay out of the walled garden. FWIW I'm not worried about Fastmail acting against my best interest.
> And let’s not forget there’s no such thing as “a backdoor for law enforcement”. A backdoor is a backdoor, and it will be exploited by malicious actors. And they’re mandatory? Black hats everywhere must be getting dehydrated from salivating so much.
I'm aware there's no such thing as a secure backdoor. Also to my knowledge the law doesn't mandate them, only access to the requested data. Said access could require manual action.
I don't agree with the law, but again the law does not change anything wrt Fastmail's obligations; anything the government might ask of them now, the government could have asked of them before.
It's a shit world requiring shit tradeoffs and Fastmail is one of few companies that are working towards keeping the internet open and (somewhat) decentralized. Their reward? The implication that they are somehow worse than any other non-e2e email service in any other country.
That doesn’t sound like a small thing. “Nobody can read your private data, not even us” is a big selling point these days. Sounds like Australian companies can no longer do that, putting them at a disadvantage.
And let’s not forget there’s no such thing as “a backdoor for law enforcement”. A backdoor is a backdoor, and it will be exploited by malicious actors. And they’re mandatory? Black hats everywhere must be getting dehydrated from salivating so much.