Re:Sanders to propose canceling entire $1.6T in US student l...
by forgottenpass on Monday June 24, 2019 @10:17AM
(#20263714)
>Fixing poor public policy in this case isn't subsidizing weakness; it's correcting an economic inefficiency.
If the government doesn't first fix higher education for people graduating highschool from now into the future, then they're not accomplishing anything. They're just buying votes.
Re:Sanders to propose canceling entire $1.6T in US student l...
by toomuchtodo on Monday June 24, 2019 @01:49PM
(#20266308)
I expect that to be a part of this initiative. It would not make sense to do otherwise.
Fixing poor public policy in this case isn't subsidizing weakness; it's correcting an economic inefficiency. Somewhere between 60-70% of Americans support government funded higher ed; this is simply enacting it a bit later, retroactively (and based on polling, the support is there).
To put this into perspective, it ($1.6T) is less than 3 years of US military spending at current funding levels [1]. Pain is to be expected as the country unwinds poor decisions (education and healthcare in its current forms). Macro economic decisions should not be made emotionally, so squash the desire to argue moral hazard. We've burned up far more dollars as a country on far worse decisions.
Disclaimer: Sanders supporter, no college, no student loans
[1] https://www.thebalance.com/u-s-military-budget-components-ch...