I'm saying this because such numbers often spark anti-protester sentiment in the rest of the population, and the police is contributing by reporting exaggerated numbers of injured officers.
I did not mean to make a comparison to anywhere else, since I wouldn't know how police reports such numbers in other countries.
"Harmed by dehydration" sounded like a useful metric to have internally but if you're getting at the public perception I'd have to clearly agree. Just saw it as more of a lack in good reporting as opposed to actually tracking how people get injured in the first placed.
Politicians likewise excuse this by saying that there are no reliable reports of misconduct while also only considering reports reliable that are directly sourced from the police.
"Who watches the watchmen?" in this case is "the watchman". Requests for more accountability for police violence was basically shot down with "while there are many accusations of police violence, barely any of them have resulted in convictions".
Sure, but journalists ought to be aware both of deliberate disinformation attempts and of unconscious biases.
Where would that bar be higher, especially when reporting these numbers in the context of protest deployments?