Re:NSA Starts Contributing Low-Level Code to UEFI BIOS Alter...
by maxheadroom on Saturday June 22, 2019 @06:03AM
(#20248850)
>The title is pretty shitty but you should at least click through before making a comment.
Something, something, site guidelines about suggesting the commentor didn't RTFA.
>I trust the NSA more than random contributors on the internet that have less known motives and may in many cases be agents of foreign spy agencies.
To be fair, I think that you stated the OC's point and failed to recognise it:
Your domestic spy agency is another's foregin spy agency. Why should they trust yours over theirs? Both have (presumably) equally less-known motives, yeah?
Re:NSA Starts Contributing Low-Level Code to UEFI BIOS Alter...
by cannedslime on Saturday June 22, 2019 @07:13AM
(#20249027)
For non-americans, NSA is a "foreign spy agency"...
Re:NSA Starts Contributing Low-Level Code to UEFI BIOS Alter...
by p_l on Saturday June 22, 2019 @12:15PM
(#20250344)
And "illegal combatant"
Re:NSA Starts Contributing Low-Level Code to UEFI BIOS Alter...
by p_l on Saturday June 22, 2019 @12:16PM
(#20250348)
Coreboot is NOT an UEFI alternative. Unless you want to regress computing to closed platforms (it can be open source and closed platform).
This is a contribution to Coreboot, which is an alternative to UEFI/BIOS.
As much as I dislike US government agencies in general, I think this time they have good motive to provide good code. Undermining this code would also undermine the systems of other government agencies.
In this case, I trust the NSA more than random contributors on the internet that have less known motives and may in many cases be agents of foreign spy agencies.