News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Google+ Failed by x86_64Ubuntu on Thursday June 20, 2019 @10:23AM (#20233193)
I think they did that because of how well it worked for GMail. And Facebook was restricted too in the beginning. Obviously, Google+ didn't benefit from following the precedents set by other successful launches.
Re:Why Google+ Failed by rchaud on Thursday June 20, 2019 @10:29AM (#20233247)
Gmail's invite only approach made sense because in 2004 it was absurd for anybody to offer 1GB of free storage. Hotmail offered 200MB I think.

Compared to that, nobody cared about a Facebook ripoff with a different UI and none of the network effects.

Re:Why Google+ Failed by mongol on Thursday June 20, 2019 @12:00PM (#20234180)
I think it was way less than that. Wasn't it like ... 2MB?
Re:Why Google+ Failed by acqq on Thursday June 20, 2019 @06:22PM (#20238002)
No. It was 1 GB:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Gmail

"after considering alternatives such as 100 MB, the company finally settled upon 1 GB of space, a figure that was preposterous compared to the 2 to 4 MB that was the standard at the time.[3]"

"On 1 April 2005, exactly one year after the initial release, Gmail increased the mailbox size to 2 GB, advertising it as 2GB plus"

The sample of the news from these times:

https://betanews.com/2005/04/01/gmail-storage-to-reach-2gb-a...

Re:Why Google+ Failed by mongol on Sunday June 30, 2019 @11:29AM (#20318704)
I referred to what Hotmail had at the time.
Re:Why Google+ Failed by crumpets on Thursday June 20, 2019 @02:14PM (#20235613)
Yeah, the change to 100 or 200mb came as a desperate attempt later to stop the gmail hemorrhage.
Re:Why Google+ Failed by tigershark on Thursday June 20, 2019 @02:46PM (#20235950)
I kind of remember that was something like 10 or 20MB, but yes, was about 2 order of magnitude less.
Re:Why Google+ Failed by rawoke083600 on Thursday June 20, 2019 @12:19PM (#20234367)
True. My grandma was in fb early.. She never even knew what Google+ was. Its only a social network if there are ppl on.
Re:Why Google+ Failed by ballenf on Thursday June 20, 2019 @11:02AM (#20233589)
Gmail could send and receive emails outside gmail.

FB wasn't restricted within your likely friends group (all students at particular schools were made eligible at the same time).

Re:Why Google+ Failed by el_programmador on Thursday June 20, 2019 @10:29AM (#20233246)
GMail's time was different, there was a lot less competition among web services back then.
Re:Why Google+ Failed by wbl on Thursday June 20, 2019 @11:36AM (#20233970)
At the time Gmail launched there were a bunch of mail services.
Re:Why Google+ Failed by CondensedBrain on Thursday June 20, 2019 @12:34PM (#20234542)
GMail was different in a number of ways.

1. Exponentially more space in a market where single or double digit megabytes was the norm. GMail's original pitch was that you never had to delete an email, and that you could always find them with search.

2. It was one of the first web apps. It was dynamic in a way few sites were then. Asynchronous JavaScript (Ajax) and Web 2.0 were still new concepts.

Re:Why Google+ Failed by BookmarkSaver on Thursday June 20, 2019 @04:50PM (#20237229)
No, the difference with Gmail is that email doesn't require a network effect to be useful. If I'm the only one on G+, it is pointless. If I'm the only one on Gmail, it's just as useful as if everyone I know is on Gmail.