News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Young adults have less to spend on non-essentials, study ... by foldr on Thursday June 20, 2019 @08:12AM (#20232044)
Talking about quality of life is usually a coded way of talking about not really living in a city. Yes, London is relatively noisy, dirty, cramped, etc. The only way you can get less of that in the UK is to also have less of the benefits of living in a city. I mean, there's no other city in the UK that even has a proper public transit system. Not liking cities is, as I said, a personal preference, and perfectly fine.
Re:Young adults have less to spend on non-essentials, study ... by ck425 on Thursday June 20, 2019 @08:29AM (#20232167)
You really need to use a term other than city to describe what you're describing. I live in a city, Edinburgh, as do the various folk who have mentioned living in Manchester etc. Their not mega sprawling metropolises like London but their still cities. You're confusing the discussion by using the term improperly.
Re:Young adults have less to spend on non-essentials, study ... by foldr on Thursday June 20, 2019 @08:31AM (#20232181)
Edinburgh has a population of 489,000. You can call it a city if you like, but it's not comparable to London in any way.
Re:Young adults have less to spend on non-essentials, study ... by ck425 on Thursday June 20, 2019 @08:38AM (#20232229)
It is a city. You're inaccurately redefining the term city to meet a very narrow definition, which is confusing the discussion.
Re:Young adults have less to spend on non-essentials, study ... by bosie on Thursday June 20, 2019 @11:49AM (#20234080)
Please provide your definition of what a city is.
Re:Young adults have less to spend on non-essentials, study ... by foldr on Thursday June 20, 2019 @12:51PM (#20234745)
You can define the word how you like. London and Edinburgh aren't on the same scale.