News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:$1B for 20,000 Bay Area homes by filoleg on Tuesday June 18, 2019 @01:55PM (#20216114)
>What is the intrinsic advantage to having "local companies" to choose from in a world where every company you'd want to work for also offered remote positions?

The advantage is that on the path in-between now and the perfect future where all companies are remote-first( that we are not sure will ever happen), you will not be at a significant disadvantage when it comes to job prospects. I don't think that many people would be willing to heavily limit their job prospects (not even taking into account all the other advantages that come with living in a densely populated coastal city) while waiting for that "bright all-remote future" that may never come.

Re:$1B for 20,000 Bay Area homes by CiPHPerCoder on Tuesday June 18, 2019 @02:03PM (#20216264)
As a short-term strategic move, sure. That's pragmatic.

But given a ceteris paribus comparison of the two, my question is what is inherently superior about the onsite position over the remote position?