The ends do justify the means. You don't think shipping food is more important than shipping cheap plastic toys from China? What an odd view.
>Maybe we should let out all of the bank robbers who were robbing to get money in order to eat and survive
I guess it might be news to you, but personal circumstances definitely are taken into account during sentencing in any nation state worth its salt.
Of course it does. People have choice when it comes to picking leisure activities.
Do you have choice when it comes to how stuff you buy is transported to you?
What you seem to be advocating for is an almost complete cessation in consuming stuff, which is impossible to do without a big hit to one's standard of living.
Compared to all this, choosing a leisure activity that is fun, relaxing, and doesn't devastate the environment should be pretty fucking easy.
To use steel as an example, America still produces a HUGE amount of steel. But most is now specialty alloys (which requires more precision, control and ingredient purity) rather than bulk mild steel.
You can definitely choose how stuff is transported to you. One example is to purchase more locally sourced / produced goods.
What's disingenuous is acting as if that statement matters at all when talking about large pollution sources. You're saying the ends justifies the means. I don't think most people would agree. Maybe we should let out all of the bank robbers who were robbing to get money in order to eat and survive, vs those who did it to buy nice cars and enrich themselves or something.