I've been in lots of places - pre Uber - where I didn't even speak the local language. Even then finding a taxi was not taxing. If Uber can't make a profit on local traffic it is going to be a mighty feat if they make money off non-local traffic.
Driver took advantage of their complicated fare system to add supplement charges that didn’t apply: charged us the baggage supplement for our backpacks that we carried in the car, and charged us a supplement for going to the train station, which should only apply from the train station.
The local taxi authority requires us to complain by post with an original receipt.
The postage costs of sending that with tracking defeats the purpose.
Most people wouldn’t even realize they were overcharged, after all, we paid what was on the meter. And issuing receipts is only by request.
We don’t have enough data to determine if the driver was excellently skilled or suicidal.
Meanwhile with Uber, you get a fancy receipt emailed to you listing route/charges, a sensible (if unregulated) complaints process, and ratings from other riders.
I disagree that there is no network effect. When one travels to another country it is much easier to use Uber rather than to find what local brew of 'carpooling' service is available, create an account, put in credit card info etc.
Their tech is easily replicable but their global presence is not.