Re:OpenMandriva, the first Clang-built Linux distribution
by oneplane on Sunday June 16, 2019 @02:06PM
(#20196927)
Not sure how wide Apple has adopted it or how much of a 'distro' you could call their operating systems, but much is built using LLVM with clang where publicly visible.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:OpenMandriva, the first Clang-built Linux distribution
by dnautics on Sunday June 16, 2019 @02:18PM
(#20197007)
Also, to be pedantic, apple is a BSD, not a linux.
Re:OpenMandriva, the first Clang-built Linux distribution
by meruru on Sunday June 16, 2019 @03:41PM
(#20197469)
Mac OS is its own operating system with its own kernel. It's neither Linux nor BSD.
Re:OpenMandriva, the first Clang-built Linux distribution
by dnautics on Sunday June 16, 2019 @03:43PM
(#20197479)
oh good point, TIL only the posix and syscall layer is BSD. nonetheless it's not at all a linux.
Re:OpenMandriva, the first Clang-built Linux distribution
by pjmlp on Sunday June 16, 2019 @06:03PM
(#20198197)
If you want to see how much different they are, have a look at
"Mac OS X Internals: A Systems Approach"
https://www.amazon.com/Mac-OS-Internals-Systems-Approach-ebo...
Since then, has macOS become even further away from BSD, with its own Network stack, XPC, SIP and many other architecture changes.
Re:OpenMandriva, the first Clang-built Linux distribution
by mailslot on Sunday June 16, 2019 @06:06PM
(#20198218)
It’s a certified UNIX, which Linux & BSD are clones of (UNIX).
Re:OpenMandriva, the first Clang-built Linux distribution
by cat199 on Sunday June 16, 2019 @07:46PM
(#20198660)
this is taking the post USL vs BSD legalized definition of unix,
which, w/r/t history, is revisionist.
following the lineage and where active development happened at the time (80s/early 90s), one can easily make the case that BSD is unix.