Re:Word processors are ditching equation editors in favour o...
by dan-robertson on Saturday June 15, 2019 @06:09PM
(#20192500)
I claim such a solution would be morally wrong (I am not going to comment on whether such a solution would be good in practice or not) because latex largely throws away the data it has on the table structure and this solution tries to piece it together again. I claim a morally better solution is to have latex not throw away the information it had, but I concede itβs often harder to modify something big and old and complex than to produce something new which is supposed to always work.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Word processors are ditching equation editors in favour o...
by mwcampbell on Saturday June 15, 2019 @08:37PM
(#20193097)
Reconstructing content and formatting from a PDF through OCR, machine learning, etc. may not be the best possible solution. But it would still make more information accessible to more people. So I must vehemently disagree that it would be morally wrong.
Re:Word processors are ditching equation editors in favour o...
by GavinMcG on Saturday June 15, 2019 @07:09PM
(#20192755)
Can you elaborate on the moral principles you're employing here?
Re:Word processors are ditching equation editors in favour o...
by sjy on Sunday June 16, 2019 @02:05AM
(#20194083)
I assumed your parent was using 'morally' as it is sometimes used in mathematics: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1434043/sources-of-...
Re:Word processors are ditching equation editors in favour o...
by pishpash on Saturday June 15, 2019 @06:35PM
(#20192614)
Morally wrong? What the actual f. The proposed is a perfectly reasonable and decoupled solution that would solve the problem for troves of existing, unstructured paper documents, too. In fact, it likely already exists.