News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Woman With No Fear Intrigues Scientists by tjr on Friday December 17, 2010 @05:32PM (#2018150)
Could you not observe the potentially dangerous dogs and then logically conclude that it may be prudent to leave the area? Why would you have to be afraid?
Re:Woman With No Fear Intrigues Scientists by sliverstorm on Friday December 17, 2010 @06:01PM (#2018238)
Logic can fail to put 2 and 2 together. Logic isn't always fast.

Fear is very, very fast and almost never fails. It allows the danger to command your attention in a way logic alone can never achieve. It also stimulates the whole fight-or-flight response, souping you up with chemicals in case you need 'em. It has it's limitations, but on the whole it does a much better job than logic would alone IMHO.

Being geekish myself, I totally understand the desire to replace everything with cool, calculating logic, but our basic instincts usually do a pretty damn good job. An easy example is if you put your hand on a hot stove, you will instinctively pull away, often even before you feel pain or heat. If you relied on logic (gee, this stove is hot and my hand hurts! I should pull my hand away) your burn would be much, much worse.

Re:Woman With No Fear Intrigues Scientists by geoffw8 on Friday December 17, 2010 @08:45PM (#2018635)
Yeah, fear is the loud siren, and red flashing lights, nuclear meltdown type warning.