Chase did a bad thing, so we did a good thing

Re:Chase did a bad thing, so we did a good thing by mirimir on Tuesday June 11, 2019 @11:19PM (#20161476)

True. But they've never posted very frequently. So maybe this is just an important issue for them.

Also, are baseless allegations OK here?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Chase did a bad thing, so we did a good thing by pkfrank on Wednesday June 12, 2019 @10:01AM (#20164706)

This. I just don't post here frequently or check HN. Rest assured I am a real person.

I have mentioned my Twitter in previous comments (https://twitter.com/peterkimfrank) and you'll see my submission history maps pretty well to my role at my company (https://dev.to/peter).

This was a weird comment thread to wake up to...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Chase did a bad thing, so we did a good thing by Nition on Wednesday June 12, 2019 @12:12AM (#20161712)

Well, personally my guess is that it's actually a legitimate user since the username is based on their real name, and they've linked to their Twitter account in the past. It'd be pretty silly to sell an account so closely linked to your identity. Unless it was hacked and sold without the user's knowledge I guess.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Chase did a bad thing, so we did a good thing by solarkraft on Wednesday June 12, 2019 @07:47AM (#20163577)

Plus it'd be really stupid for the buyer to mention it. How about stopping this thread derailment?

[ Parent | on HN ]