Re:The End of Political Cartoons at The New York Times
by eanzenberg on Monday June 10, 2019 @05:39PM
(#20151154)
Correctness literally doesn't matter in the realm of politics. Only, who is the loudest and most persuasive.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The End of Political Cartoons at The New York Times
by kodz4 on Monday June 10, 2019 @05:56PM
(#20151275)
More like a bias towards people with the most energy.
There are lots of loud and persuasive people around, but to stay relevant, social/news media selects for the ones that are tireless in performing their routines with robotic efficiency day in day out.
Re:The End of Political Cartoons at The New York Times
by anomaloops on Monday June 10, 2019 @06:06PM
(#20151359)
As an aside, is there a latin-based term for this kind of authoritative persuasion? I want to say it's ochlocracy, but generally it's not just any kind of mob I'm thinking of, but the mob that is the loudest. Rule by the loudest voices. A magnaocracy? (not to be confused with the fantastical magocracy)
Re:The End of Political Cartoons at The New York Times
by nerfhammer on Monday June 10, 2019 @06:12PM
(#20151391)
(-cracy words are Greek anyway)