News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Traffic-busting $100B Bay Area tax plan taking shape by arcticbull on Sunday June 09, 2019 @09:29PM (#20143138)
And not solve transportation at all. Tunnels for individuals with primarily single-occupant vehicles are counter-productive. We need more public transit. Parking is expensive, insurance is expensive, the vast majority of the bay area public will be left out by this plan.

Either way tunnels aren't particularly expensive, stations, on-ramps/off-ramps are.

Re:Traffic-busting $100B Bay Area tax plan taking shape by logiczero on Sunday June 09, 2019 @11:28PM (#20143704)
Why is there an assumption that the tunnels have to be for cars? Create tunnels for bicycles instead: - Tunnels don´t need to be nearly as big, and would still have higher capacity - The friction of ¨I won´t ride a bike because it´s dangerous¨ is reduced or eliminated - Weather as a factor in commuting by bike is eliminated - Like a railway grade, you can basically eliminate any significant elevation ascents/descents
Re:Traffic-busting $100B Bay Area tax plan taking shape by wahern on Sunday June 09, 2019 @11:29PM (#20143709)
You're conflating Musk's underground highway concept with his proposed solutions for cheaper tunnel construction. The latter is required for the former, but not vice-versa. Musk's 14-foot tunnels are large enough for a traditional subway. See my reply to the parent.