Re:Traffic-busting $100B Bay Area tax plan taking shape
by logiczero on Sunday June 09, 2019 @11:28PM
(#20143704)
Why is there an assumption that the tunnels have to be for cars? Create tunnels for bicycles instead:
- Tunnels don´t need to be nearly as big, and would still have higher capacity
- The friction of ¨I won´t ride a bike because it´s dangerous¨ is reduced or eliminated
- Weather as a factor in commuting by bike is eliminated
- Like a railway grade, you can basically eliminate any significant elevation ascents/descents
Re:Traffic-busting $100B Bay Area tax plan taking shape
by wahern on Sunday June 09, 2019 @11:29PM
(#20143709)
You're conflating Musk's underground highway concept with his proposed solutions for cheaper tunnel construction. The latter is required for the former, but not vice-versa. Musk's 14-foot tunnels are large enough for a traditional subway. See my reply to the parent.
Either way tunnels aren't particularly expensive, stations, on-ramps/off-ramps are.