Files UWP: An enthusiast’s take on what Windows File Explorer explorer should be

Re:Files UWP: An enthusiast’s take on what Windows File Expl... by kumarharsh on Saturday June 08, 2019 @01:44AM (#20130842)

I agree to those points, and really happy that 7-Zip still fits on a floppy (when the floppy itself is dead). The bloat is real, but it's not something specific to Windows. All three platforms, plus the web, have become bloated. But picking the 50mb size as a stick to beat an app which is still maturing is too harsh, IMO.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Files UWP: An enthusiast’s take on what Windows File Expl... by mysterydip on Saturday June 08, 2019 @07:14AM (#20131796)

If it was just a regular app I'd agree, but file explorer is pretty integral to the OS experience. Any bloat there cascades as multiple instances are launched or called from other applications. As a counterexample, here's XYplorer, another file explorer alternative: https://www.xyplorer.com/ which weighs in at 7MB.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Files UWP: An enthusiast’s take on what Windows File Expl... by ploxiln on Saturday June 08, 2019 @02:09AM (#20130912)

True - and reports seem to be that the actual compiled code is like 18 MiB. It's the comparison to these huge android apps that got me. I could do this for android too: keepassdroid is 4 MiB, zxing barcode scanner is 0.7 MiB ...

So many people just don't understand the scale of these things.

[ Parent | on HN ]