Too much money and too few places to invest it

Re:Too much money and too few places to invest it by dev_dull on Thursday June 06, 2019 @09:00PM (#20120704)

It’s trickled down but in narrow bands. For example, starting salaries in the Bay Area are up big in the last decade, partly because of an influx of easy money into tech growth tech companies.

However, much of that goes directly into the pockets of land owners.

Ultimately the winners in QE are those that own the finite resources.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Too much money and too few places to invest it by siculars on Thursday June 06, 2019 @09:28PM (#20120848)

Ya, and? Isn't that always the case - the owners of finite resources profit. Is there some other way it would be?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Too much money and too few places to invest it by piva00 on Friday June 07, 2019 @04:14AM (#20122612)

Having more owners of finite resources instead of helping them to concentrate it through mergers and acquisitions could be a way.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Too much money and too few places to invest it by chiefalchemist on Friday June 07, 2019 @11:33AM (#20125575)

> " the owners of finite resources profit"

That's not the issue. The issue is the Fed tilted the game in the favor those already winning the game. And as a friendly reminder, no one elected the Fed.

[ Parent | on HN ]