Re:Soviets say Allied version of D-Day is a 'distortion' of ...
by 6d6b73 on Thursday June 06, 2019 @07:15AM
(#20113366)
They were on Nazi side at the beginning of the war, so really they were trying to stop the Nazi tide that they helped to create.
Re:Soviets say Allied version of D-Day is a 'distortion' of ...
by flohofwoe on Thursday June 06, 2019 @08:56AM
(#20114065)
Everybody downvoting this should read up on the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pac..., especially the secret protocol to divide Poland between Germany and the Soviet Union.
Re:Soviets say Allied version of D-Day is a 'distortion' of ...
by futureastronaut on Thursday June 06, 2019 @10:49AM
(#20115058)
Isn't this common historical knowledge? Sad if not.
Re:Soviets say Allied version of D-Day is a 'distortion' of ...
by whack on Thursday June 06, 2019 @09:15AM
(#20114223)
I'm certainly no Soviet admirer or apologist as my last paragraph made clear. However, it seems a stretch to say that they helped create the Nazi tide. The Germans had such little respect for Soviet resistance, that they expected it to collapse like a house of cards within a few months. Hitler would have started the war, with or without the non-aggression pact.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_casualties_in_World_W...
The Nazis lost over two million soldiers in the Eastern front, whereas all the other fronts combined produced a loss of ~800k soldiers. The turning point of the war came in Stalingrad, an entire year before D-Day even started.
The Soviet Union has been a brutal regime and I'm glad they lost the cold war. But the Russian people deserve more credit than they are being given for turning back the Nazi tide.