News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why aren’t more companies remote-first? by alexhutcheson on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @10:30AM (#20104735)
At GitLab they have pretty explicit and open policies about this: https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/people-operations/code-of-...
Re:Why aren’t more companies remote-first? by Aeolun on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @12:14PM (#20105888)
Statements like “Please get approval at least a month before you move” always rub me entirely the wrong way.

If I’m working remote it’s because I don’t want to be bound to a certain location, and whether or not I move is none of the companies’s business as long as I fulfill my duties.

Re:Why aren’t more companies remote-first? by 0xffff2 on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @03:53PM (#20108458)
Although GitLab is especially egregious in that it pays different rates based on location, I'm not sure that it's practical from a legal perspective to say where you live is none of the companies business. If you're an employee (as opposed to a contractor), the company has certain legal obligations that may change depending on what state or country you call home.
Re:Why aren’t more companies remote-first? by ShakataGaNai on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @03:33PM (#20108270)
Or... if you're working remote it's because you like the peace and quiet of working in a private space ... and enjoy not having a 2 hour commute a day. There are more than one reason to do anything.

Now I'm sure if you were interviewing at GitLab, you'd know about this policy in advance (because it's public) and could plan accordingly. Or ...hey... ask your manager to be if they'd have any problem with you being a digital nomad on the job. The policy basically says you only need approval... so you could ask.