Re:Why aren’t more companies remote-first?
by chmars on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @09:55AM
(#20104347)
How do you deal with the various legal issues, mainly local labor laws, local tax obligations and local social security insurance systems?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why aren’t more companies remote-first?
by emilecantin on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @10:24AM
(#20104668)
There are a few companies that exist to provide exactly that service, which kind of look like temp agencies. Gitlab uses CXC Global in my country, for example.
Re:Why aren’t more companies remote-first?
by gnopgnip on Thursday June 06, 2019 @03:03PM
(#20117893)
I work for a company in the bay area that has about 1/4 of our employees as remote now, and 5 years ago had none. A PEO like SOI/Trinet is what makes this possible
Re:Why aren’t more companies remote-first?
by calcifer on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @09:59AM
(#20104392)
That becomes the contractor's problem unless you live in the few places where Gitlab has a legal presence.
It looks like you can choose to be employee, https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/contracts/
Re:Why aren’t more companies remote-first?
by calcifer on Wednesday June 05, 2019 @10:42AM
(#20104875)
I don't see anything in there about a choice to be an employee. Which makes sense, you can't employ people in a country without being an employer.
Correct, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/people-operations/global-c... and specifically https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/blob/master/dat... for a list of countries in which we can hire you as an employee.
Re:Why aren’t more companies remote-first?
by literallycancer on Thursday June 06, 2019 @10:05AM
(#20114659)
Do you just use 0.411 for countries where you have no COL data?