-Speed: During my testing with PIA and TorGuard, PIA was consistently 50% faster.
-App: The TorGuard app is lacking in features and poorly designed.
-Price: It's substantially more expensive than most providers.
-Reputation: They've had not too great a reputation for a while now
I do not believe that you are an objective party here.
According to comments on his review they've also added Google trackers/capchas to their login page, something you wouldn't see on a reputable provider.
Give me a break...
App - The app's design is fine, a bit old school, but easy to use and updated within the last year. It also has a ton of security features (app + network switch), streaming IP integration, and the list goes on.
Price - It's the same price as PIA now, and with my discount code "tomspark" which isn't unique really, since TG has thousands of 50% off codes floating around, its $5 a month compared to $10 a month with PIA...
Reputation - TG's reputation has been flawless. They don't make any false claims and are honest about their jurisdiction, as well as a no logs policy.This is why so many VPNs try to buy them out (as claimed in the TG lawsuit document)..The fact they are sueing another VPN for blackmailing them is a good thing IMO. They are showing some balls. The fact so many VPNs are trying to DDOS TorGuard as well, shows they are doing something right.
So yes, I am an objective party. I have been reviewing VPNs since 2015, and have re-reviewed more than 20+ VPNs this year alone.
Not to mention TorGuard only has an affiliate commission rate of 30% which makes it lower than most any other VPN in the industry (proving that I am not a sellout like other reviewers).
In regards to price, no one in their right mind should pay for a VPN monthly.
PIA is $84 for two years.
For one thing, I don't think nordvpn would care about the 5k bug bounty.
From reading https://restoreprivacy.com/torguard-nordvpn-lawsuit-blackmai... it seems like there are quite a few serious allegations that are so absolutely ridiculous that it has to be nonsense or so ridiculous they're likely to be true.
Also, suing the wrong company is a big oversight. That's really sloppy work and doesn't inspire a lot of confidence.
You just posted a link to a blog that rates NordVPN as it's #2 rated VPN, and hasn't even reviewed TorGuard yet, so that source is not credible at all.
We're not comparing service quality so I don't understand what them not having reviewed TorGuard has to do with anything.
FWIW, I think the link posted was clearer and fairly objective.
I 'll also add that the other video you made: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwHssMNEWMg is more useful because it addresses some questions I had like why NordVPN would think to remove your video through TorGuard and if they had reached out to you directly.
All in all, very strange situation and I am interested to see how this pans out.
News has to be objective. He doesn't mention how A) NordVPN was given a file instead of the file being given to TorGuard first which is extremely weird, B) NordVPN does not mention showing up to TG's house C) Why would NordVPN help TG fix a bug when the two companies have been butting heads for years now? D) NordVPN admits in the blog post that they started the conversation in hope TG would stop "defaming them" which is basically an insinuation of blackmail. E) NordVPN has not denied any actual relationship to Collective Seven yet. I could continue down the alphabet, but you get the picture (watch my video on it).
You're not biased at all are you Mr. TorGuard Affiliate?
Mr. TorGuard Affiliate that lists only one VPN (TorGuard) on his website as "God Tier", what a joke.
They are also in the news a lot for various things and I make sure to cover it whereas other VPN affiliates don't (most VPN affiliates are aligned with 100% based comission VPNs like Nord).
I summarized the entire story with 3 videos if anyone wants the full story. Or the latest take on Nord's blog post here (which I believe to be complete bull) :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icD3Bva7xtY