News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Central Park Five by themgt on Sunday June 02, 2019 @04:50PM (#20078079)
The report is incredibly damning. Just to use one example, Korey Wise is in the NYT, described as:

Wise, 16, wasn’t a suspect, but he agreed to go with his friend for moral support. He ended up being charged as well

No description of why he would be charged. Clearly a gross miscarriage of justice.

Armstrong report:

In addition, several statements were made by witnesses to officers investigating the incident and by the defendants, speaking outside the formal interrogation process, which directly contradict Reyes’s claim that he acted alone, and evidence the participation of the defendants. They include inculpatory statements by defendants Wise, Richardson and Santana both to police officers and to civilian witnesses who reported the statements to police. Santana and Richardson separately pointed out the location of the rape when brought to Central Park. When Wise was questioned, he made reference to a man named “Rudy” who took the jogger’s Walkman; the description of the jogger’s “Walkman pouch” was similar to Reyes’s description of a “fanny pack.” At the time of this interview, the police had no way of knowing that the jogger had a Walkman or that she carried it in a pouch. Wise also commented on the amount of blood at the spot where the rape occurred. When asked why he was so surprised by the amount of blood, he answered, “I knew she was bleeding but I didn’t know how bad she was. It was really dark. I couldn’t see how much blood there was at night.”

https://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/Armstrong.pdf

Re:The Central Park Five by DuskStar on Sunday June 02, 2019 @05:30PM (#20078375)
Shit like this significantly contributes to the legitimacy of calling the NYT "fake news".

When you tell a story from one side, and one side only...

(I don't mean that it's a good thing to call news orgs "fake news". I mean that if someone is already calling you "fake news", you should really take care to have impeccable reporting to avoid giving those accusations weight)

Re:The Central Park Five by throwaway987665 on Sunday June 02, 2019 @07:05PM (#20078988)
The nytimes is very much aware of this report and there is a reason it doesn’t take it seriously

https://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/28/nyregion/new-slant-on-jog...

Re:The Central Park Five by xrd on Sunday June 02, 2019 @10:09PM (#20079883)
That is a very interesting read. Totally different than people here are painting the situation.