News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Abuses show Assange case was never about law by Xylakant on Friday May 31, 2019 @12:05PM (#20062144)
> but calling somebody a regular writer somewhere when they actually just write articles for syndication feels disingenuous.

The author gets to choose where their writing get syndicated to. It’s a conscious decision, for whatever reason they make it: money, principle, or just good friends with the owner. So I don’t think it’s disingenuous to point it that they have chosen to write regularly for UNZ.

I haven’t judged UNZ either way, I’m just providing a citation for the claim that Jonathan Cook writes fro UNZ. Make of that information what you want.

Re:Abuses show Assange case was never about law by dylan604 on Friday May 31, 2019 @01:31PM (#20063051)
> The author gets to choose where their writing get syndicated to.

Is it? I don't know how writing syndication works, but I had the understanding that you worked with a syndication company, and they just make the content available for anyone willing to pay the syndication fees for access to the content.