News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions t... by Aeolun on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @08:30PM (#20047201)
Unfortunately, my Firefox on Ubuntu just keeps claiming more and more memory until it runs out and freezes the system.

I don’t want to use Chrome, but I still wouldn’t call that very great.

Re:Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions t... by riskable on Thursday May 30, 2019 @11:01AM (#20051900)
What extensions do you have loaded? Done anything else to customize it?

I've been running Firefox for over a year now on my Kubuntu desktop and haven't had that issue. Not with pre-Quantum or post-Quantum Firefox.

Also, some tabs will continually use more and more memory due to poorly-written JavaScript. That's not really Firefox's fault but Chrome seems to be much more aggressive in shutting those sorts of things down (which can be annoying because if you go over that threshold in your own JavaScript it'll stop working and you'll get ambiguous resource errors in the console).

Re:Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions t... by Aeolun on Thursday May 30, 2019 @08:18PM (#20057198)
I have only Bitwarden and Rikaikun loaded.

My tabs might be using a lot of memory though (React + Redux gets reloaded an awful lot).

Regardless, I’d expect my browser to be smart enough to know that allocating even more memory when the system is out and it already uses 12GB is probably not desireable.

Re:Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions t... by StavrosK on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @08:44PM (#20047270)
I have been running Firefox on Ubuntu for years and have never had this problem. Try deleting your profile?
Re:Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions t... by FrozenVoid on Thursday May 30, 2019 @02:21AM (#20048850)
Try removing custom css from the firefox profile(userchrome.css/usercontent.css) and disabling themes.
Re:Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions t... by Aeolun on Thursday May 30, 2019 @08:20PM (#20057212)
Thanks, I’ll try. How would those things ever end up using gigabytes of RAM though?