News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions t... by laminar_flow on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @05:13PM (#20045561)
Definitely time to ditch Chrome, but also even more of a reason to set up a PiHole https://pi-hole.net/
Re:Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions t... by zaroth on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @05:49PM (#20045928)
It saddens me that Pi-Hole is pulling a mere $1,700/mo on Patreon.

There must be just way too much friction for a user to say, yeah, charge me $1/mo please.

Re:Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions t... by tty2300 on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @05:57PM (#20045991)
That's a pretty good amount to be making. Should easily pay for the time spent maintaining the project.
Re:Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions t... by zaroth on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @06:48PM (#20046470)
I’m not sure if this is sarcasm?

No, $24k gross per year does not even begin to cover the amount of work put in to create and maintain software at the level of Pi-Hole. Not even remotely close. Not even 1/10th.

Pi-Hole should be making $1m ARR at least. 53 releases (going back to 2015), 2,765 issues on Github, multiple devs, supporting multiple platforms, extensive documentation, and on and on.

$24k/yr, come on...

Re:Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions t... by tty2300 on Thursday May 30, 2019 @05:39AM (#20049650)
The top contributer has 500 commits since 2015. Its clearly a side project so $24,000 per year for a side project is very nice especially if you live somewhere with a good cost of living.
Re:Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions t... by president on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @06:35PM (#20046357)
I've thought about using pi-hole but wonder about ads being served from the same domains as the content providers. Is/has this been an issue at all?
Re:Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions t... by kunday on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @07:43PM (#20046886)
I have used a pi-hole based blocker for a while, and I have noticed increasingly ads showing up because they are using same domains, both in-app(iOS) and normal desktop. I've settled for a mix of network wide ad-block via pi-hole and adguard(uses mitm for https blocking) to remove almost all ads. In my experience uBlock Origin has made my aging laptop battery drain a lot quicker.

PS: I'm not sure if I would recommend Adguard, but works fine, but somehow the root certificate keeps me left a little bit dreary about possible future Adguard intentions.

Re:Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions t... by xythian on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @07:40PM (#20046867)
Yes, it's an issue and there's nothing a pi-hole can do to solve the issue. YouTube is the most notable server of ads from content servers, but one can imagine more content providers following suit eventually.

However, you can have your pi-hole up and running in a few minutes and enjoy excellent network wide ad blocking for virtually every service that isn't YouTube.

Re:Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions t... by kunday on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @07:48PM (#20046919)
Also related, I found by Bravia running Android tv would come to crawling halt if I used a pi-hole and loaded YouTube. I did the right thing by buying YouTube premium but still Youtube was doing aggressive pings back to their ad servers even with telemetry disabled. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Re:Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions t... by OrwellianChild on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @06:17PM (#20046210)
Can you help a newbie understand why I'd want to use this instead of Firefox + uBlock Origin? Seems like a lot of extra maintenance overhead...
Re:Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions t... by xythian on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @07:41PM (#20046874)
Pi-hole will also catch all kinds of tracking and analytics requests that are sent via your mobile devices, non-browser apps, etc. There's a whole lot more of your data leaking out into the world than just the stuff that comes and goes via ad networks.
Re:Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions t... by tgsovlerkhgsel on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @06:40PM (#20046404)
You only need to set it up once per network, instead of once per browser, and it is capable of filtering (most) ads even on closed platforms (e.g. apps on non-rooted phones).

The downside is that it is much less granular and harder to set up exceptions.

Re:Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions t... by Chirael on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @07:59PM (#20046993)
The other downside is that if you have a laptop and take it outside your home network, the ads will reappear.
Re:Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions t... by kunday on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @07:50PM (#20046934)
If you are keen to try out how it works, give https://www.nextdns.io/ a try.

I'm not the maker of the app not can vouch for its integrity but you get a sense of how much network bandwidth ad and tracking takes up on your network.

Re:Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions t... by bscphil on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @08:09PM (#20047064)
This doesn't really explain how a PiHole compares to an ad blocking extension. Both block ads at the network level so your browser never has to download them.