Re:Police in Canada Are Tracking People’s ‘Negative’ Behavio...
by antepodius on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @08:30AM
(#20039277)
'We should hold police accountable and train them better' is orthogonal to 'you shouldn't talk to or interact with the police if you can help it'. You do the first to reduce the probable number of- let's say 'possibly evil police'. You do the second to reduce the probability of being damaged by 'possibly evil police'. Being for the first idea doesn't give a reason to be against the second idea. In fact, if your goal is to minimise the chance of getting fucked by police, you want to take both measures.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Police in Canada Are Tracking People’s ‘Negative’ Behavio...
by mcv on Wednesday May 29, 2019 @10:36AM
(#20040687)
You're right. Still, I think it's terrible that 'you shouldn't talk to the police'. Talking to the police should be a safe thing to do. There should be trust between the people and the police. Police need to be able to talk to people in order to understand the real problems that need to be solved.
My goal is not merely to not get fucked by the police, my goal is a better, safer society.
Re:Police in Canada Are Tracking People’s ‘Negative’ Behavio...
by antepodius on Thursday May 30, 2019 @04:01PM
(#20055342)
It doesn't matter how safe the police are comparatively, they'll never be safe. You can make the mechanisms on guns more and more reliable, and that's good, but not engaging in trigger/gun discipline is still always the wrong move.
Police have power. You can't have functional police that don't have power, so fundamentally police are dangerous.