News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Scrum is fragile, not Agile by kzzzznot on Monday May 27, 2019 @02:29PM (#20024235)
> "it should almost never take longer than that" vs. "it will probably take that long."

This sounds like a much better way to estimate. Do you have any links to content discussing this?

Re:Scrum is fragile, not Agile by munchbunny on Tuesday May 28, 2019 @05:12AM (#20028437)
Here's an article that explains the phenomenon much better than I can. It made its rounds in HN a week or two ago: https://erikbern.com/2019/04/15/why-software-projects-take-l...

I haven't seen a good way to turn the concept of "it should almost never take longer than that" into a concrete process. I've always seen it as a gut check, often implemented as "take your initial estimate and double/triple it." What I actually see is that a lot of teams implement that but walk back the doubling when the business/PM delegation persistently asks for more in less time. Only in really engineer driven cultures have I seen engineering teams successfully push back.

Re:Scrum is fragile, not Agile by iicc on Thursday June 06, 2019 @09:34AM (#20114353)
On the actual use and calibration of confidence intervals - https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ybYBCK9D7MZCcdArB/how-to-mea...