What should they have done differently? If bank lending really was frozen solid, is the argument that it would have been better for the Fed not to make these loans, and not turn a profit in doing so?
There's some vague hand waving here about competitors who may also have been affected by the credit freeze who may not have received similar details, but I'm not seeing any specifics.
Are you simply complaining that there may be something to complain about?
I'm not even always against the government making such decisions.
It's just the bailout involved the government making these decision in the worst possible circumstance, the least democratic, the least open and the most remunerative-to-bad-actors circumstances.
severe inflation is virtually always conditional on the money supply being controlled by a legislature