The general rule is that property owned prior to a marriage remains the separate property of that owner. So the answer to your first question is generally A.
The answers to your other questions will depend on whether the couple is in a marital property state or a community property state, because the default rules regarding marital income are different.
Yet if you take that view then by sharing in the mortgage payments partner A may have become landlord to partner B and renter’s protection might apply to partner B.
> The general rule is that property owned prior to a marriage remains the separate property of that owner.
Well, that's one possible rule; it's not the only/universal one.
(As a traditional ceremony might say, "with all my worldly goods I thee endow". That doesn't sound much like maintaining separate property...)
Traditional ceremonies aren't contracts.
Not sure why you've been downvoted. This is how it works in my country and I think this makes sense.
Because the topic is not "what's the default legal situation".
Re:Combining finances
by infinite8s on Saturday May 25, 2019 @10:13AM
(#20009165)
But if you don't discuss beforehand and come to an agreement, the default legal situation applies.
Re:Combining finances
by cheerlessbog on Saturday May 25, 2019 @05:52AM
(#20008057)
If three was a mortgage on the property the payments on the principal are presumably community property, and the appreciation of that post of the value.
1 partner enters the marriage with a $500K paid off house, the other enters with nothing. They divorce 20 years later and the house is appraised at $2.5M, should:
A: partner 1 receive $2.5M, partner 2 receive $0?
B: partner 1 receive $1.25M, partner 2 receive $1.25M?
C: partner 1 receive $1.5M, partner 2 receive $1M? D: other?
How does this answer change if the house can be sold vs can’t be sold? How does this answer change if partner 1 comes into the marriage with a partially paid off mortgage and both contribute to mortgage payments afterwards? How does it change if the house is underwater instead?
The problem is all of the above models are legitimate models of how to split ownership, but they’re incompatible views. So you need to reach alignment at the start of the relationship over which model to use, otherwise what could have been an amicable parting ends in bitter recrimination.