Re:Seesmic: Why it's so important to just frackin' start
by mattmaroon on Monday May 26, 2008 @02:52AM
(#200044)
I must be missing something about Seesmic. It's like YouTube but minus the volume slider. But it's integrated with TechCrunch's commenting system. Is that really a competitive edge?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Seesmic: Why it's so important to just frackin' start
by michaelr on Monday May 26, 2008 @11:15AM
(#200244)
Whatever it is you're missing I'm missing too. There seems to be a massive lack of value-add considering what's already out there.
Re:Seesmic: Why it's so important to just frackin' start
by wumi on Monday May 26, 2008 @03:21AM
(#200057)
do you not see the irony in defending TipJoy and later ripping on Seesmic?
As Ivan, PG and others said about TipJoy -- it launched relatively recently and the company is iterating through features.
How does Seesmic not deserve the same patience?
Re:Seesmic: Why it's so important to just frackin' start
by mattmaroon on Monday May 26, 2008 @02:22PM
(#200361)
I don't read ten blog posts a day about how great TipJoy is. I do about Seesmic.
I'm not counting Seesmic out, I just don't get the hype.
Re:Seesmic: Why it's so important to just frackin' start
by wumi on Monday May 26, 2008 @03:57PM
(#200411)
Understood; as others mentioned, the hype seems to do with good PR and Loic knowing a ton of the right people.
Then again, who wouldn't want that attention? I'm sure TipJoy certainly would. The only bloggers I've seen with a TipJoy are either YC founders or HN readers -- which isn't a slant against TipJoy, but I'm sure they could benefit form a hype injection.
Re:Seesmic: Why it's so important to just frackin' start
by chrisbroadfoot on Monday May 26, 2008 @10:29AM
(#200222)
This just seems like a personal attack to me. Let the man say what he wants to say?